Those are all the posts that should show on the Blog Page

A paramedic with an injured man in stretcher

LETTER: Investigative report on Syrian group fell short

Amazingly CBS’ 60 Minutes ran a June 18 story on the non-governmental organization “White Helmets” (Syria Civil Defence). It described the group as strictly volunteers who help Syrians victimized by civil chaos, bombings, etc. in Syria.

But, there is another story inside this story the mainstream corporate media should have realized — unless they’re doing the establishment’s bidding? There are a lot of questions and information suggesting it is not as simple as the 60 Minutes portrayal. Articles posted on www.strategic-culture-org by Finian Cunningham, a former editor and writer for major news organizations, writing extensively about international affairs, and Peter Korzun, offer fuller insights into this group:

•The organizer of this group is a former military intelligence officer, now, private security consultant in “rebel” controlled Syria;

•The group receives government funds from the U.S., UK, Canada, Germany and Japan; the U.S. $23 million (2013-2016) flows from the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID); the latter entity has been used as “a cover for covert CIA activities;”

•The entity only provides support to Syrians “in areas controlled by the violent opposition,” but, not those who are hurt from terrorists’ attacks in the government-controlled areas;

•While the group claims not to be armed, it has been reported that photographs document members carrying arms and also “celebrating terrorist group military successes;”

•The White Helmets reportedly post false/fake photos as efforts to blame the Syrian military for targeting civilians and casualties thereto and reportedly released videos/images to the Western media from the location of the April 4 alleged chemical attack; they have also been accused of producing fake photos to blame the Russian military for actions it did not carry out;

•An investigative story by researcher and reporter Vanessa Beeley exposes one of the leaders of the group as an arms trader, supplying terrorists with arms.

Most stunning, articles about the White Helmets clearly state that it is “nothing else but an elaborate deception” and “a tool used by Western spy agencies to denigrate Russia and everyone who does not support the terrorists in their effort to overthrow the Syria’s legitimate government.”

Is this the best the major media can do in reporting to its viewers?

Deborah K. Smarth

MANALAPAN

How can Trump side with the Saudis?

President Donald Trump’s regional “peace” summit to fight terrorism with Saudi Arabia insults Americans’ intelligence. A weapons deal brokered by Trump amounting to more than $300 billion over a 10-year period is not a tool of “peace” in the region. Sen. Rand Paul should be thanked for introducing a “resolution of disapproval” motion that will force the U.S. Senate to vote on the arms deal within the next 30 days. Americans should flood the Senate phone lines to support Paul’s efforts.

The Saudi connection to 9/11 cannot be erased. Fifteen of the hijackers were Saudis. Besides being the world’s leading funders of terrorist activity and extremism, Saudi Arabia is the most flagrant violator of human rights, beheading and killing protesters and treating women unequally.

The Saudis — with the U.S. providing bombs and other military support in Yemen — have committed war crimes. The United Nations acknowledges as a result of Saudi air, land and sea blockade, there is a famine crisis in Yemen. And the Trump administration and its spokespersons demonize Iran and Syria?

Iran just conducted an open and fair national election with moderates taking power, compared to a Saudi dictatorship. Iran has expended sizeable resources and blood in fighting Salafi-Jihadist terrorism. The Syrian government has been fighting the rebels who created civil chaos in its country, including ISIS/al-Qaeda.

Trump needs to dismantle and replace his neoconservative advisers, who are leading him down the wrong path of war.

Deborah K. Smarth

PUBLISHED IN APP.COM https://www.app.com/story/opinion/readers/2017/06/01/letter-can-trump-side-saudis/102376976/

The image of Donald Trump with his wife and others

LETTER: U.S. headed down wrong path of war

President Donald Trump’s regional “peace” summit to fight terrorism with Saudi Arabia insults Americans’ intelligence. A weapons deal brokered by Trump amounting to more than $300 billion over a 10-year period is not a tool of “peace” in the region. Sen. Rand Paul should be thanked for introducing a “resolution of disapproval” motion that will force the U.S. Senate to vote on the arms deal within the next 30 days. Americans should flood the Senate phone lines to support Paul’s efforts.

The Saudi connection to 9/11 cannot be erased. Fifteen of the hijackers were Saudis. Besides being the world’s leading funders of terrorist activity and extremism, Saudi Arabia is the most flagrant violator of human rights, beheading and killing protesters and treating women unequally. According to a published Institute for Peace and Prosperity article, “The extreme Wahhabi interpretation of Sunni Islam embraced by the Saudis as a state religion is near indistinguishable from the ideology of ISIS … or any of those terror organizations.”

The Saudis — with the U.S. providing bombs and other military support in Yemen — have committed war crimes. The United Nations acknowledges as a result of Saudi air, land and sea blockade, there is a famine crisis in Yemen. And the Trump administration and its spokespersons demonize Iran and Syria?

Iran just conducted an open and fair national election with moderates taking power, compared to a Saudi dictatorship. Iran has expended sizeable resources and blood in fighting Salafi-Jihadist terrorism. The Syrian government has been fighting the rebels who created civil chaos in its country, including ISIS/al-Qaeda. Concerning the recent sarin attack in Syria, even Theodore Postol, MIT professor emeritus of science and technology, after examining the material presented by the Trump administration, questions the administration’s assumptions that Syria was responsible.

Trump needs to dismantle and replace his neoconservative advisers, who are leading him down the wrong path of war.

Deborah K. Smarth

Manalapan

The image of a election promotional event

LETTER: Syria attack narrative should be challenged

Those who occupy the White House should learn from past history. The latest charges by the Trump administration that Syrian President Bassar Assad released chemicals, killing up to 70 people including children, sounds like a familiar story played during the Obama administration.

In August 2013, President Obama charged that Assad was responsible for a missile-delivered sarin attack. Investigative and Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Seymour Hersh found compelling facts that challenged the U.S. government’s official account. In fact, he showed that the attack was most likely the work of the rebels opposing the Assad government. He said al-Nusra, a Syrian al-Qaeda division, had “mastered the mechanics of creating sarin and was capable of manufacturing it in quantity.”

Because the mainstream media would not publish Hersh’s comprehensive article alleging that the Obama administration was “cherry picking” intelligence to serve its own purpose of regime change, the account was published in the London Review of Books. Later on, James Clapper, Obama’s national intelligence director, reportedly had warned the president that the intelligence information that Syria released the sarin was not a “slam dunk.”

For the past several years, Assad has been fighting against the rebels including al-Nusra and ISIS, to prevent their takeover of Syria. The rebels, funded and trained by the U.S. and its allies, have incited chaos and violence throughout the country. It makes no sense after making strides against the opposition that the Syrian leader would initiate a chemical attack. Why hasn’t the mainstream press or members of Congress asked for more evidence from the Trump administration or called for an independent investigation of this matter?

Deborah K. Smarth

Trump pursuing more foreign involvement

The same candidate who portrayed himself as the supposed “peace” candidate when he said we’ve been in too many conflicts in the Middle East and too many wars is now sending troops to Syria. He has expanded the CIA’s power, authorizing drone strikes in Syria and beyond. According to news accounts, he is dissolving certain protections on combat drone use that the Obama administration had used; since 2004, there have been approximately 2,179 confirmed minimum drone strikes in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Somalia and Yemen, killing up to 8,897 people according to the Bureau of Investigative Journalism. These strikes kill innocent civilians and medical rescue personnel, in the hope of assassinating targeted terrorists, on suspicion only.

There have been many experts who have reported that these drone strikes are nothing more than recruitment tools for more terrorists/jihadists against the U.S. This policy has caused tremendous suffering and blowback. And, so, now President Trump decides he’s going to lower the bar “for reasonable civilian loss.”

Not even in office for 100 days, and he has erred in carrying out the Yemen drone strike which was planned by the Obama administration; he could have studied the situation further in Yemen, where America has aided and abetted the Saudis war there. But, he implemented that strike, killing an American soldier in the process and many innocent civilians, including women and children. Now, he is further empowering the CIA to execute more horrific acts of murder.

Posing as a candidate saying one thing, and now continuing America’s policies of interventionism everywhere again, does not hold out much hope for a peacetime presidency. Instead, he wants to increase the military budget, which only serves to assist the military industrial complex’s profits and promotes more wars. The administration’s latest actions are deeply disappointing in light of his campaign speeches.

He has surrounded himself with corporatists and financial elites. His inner circle appears to be too influenced by the neoconservatives who are war hawks. It’s time for Trump to rely on foreign policy experts who understand diplomacy and non-interventionism, rather than going down the path he is currently charting. It’s time to re-examine Mr. Trump’s campaign words versus his presidential actions.

Hopefully, the American people will educate themselves on these issues and be emboldened enough to oppose a foreign policy that goes in the same direction as his Republican and Democrat predecessors, which have caused disasters globally.

Deborah K. Smarth

PUBLISHED IN USA TODAY https://www.dailyrecord.com/story/opinion/letters/2017/03/15/trump-pursuing-foreign-involvement/99196330/